Sample and Procedure
As we had a two ? dos experimental design once again, however, we simultaneously assessed approval off masculinity norm given that one change (a continuous adjustable), i ple measurements of the present check out as compared to Test step one. For this reason, i first recruited 322 U.S. men through MTurk. Adopting the studies check, 28 members just weren’t care about-categorized given that heterosexual and two had been mind-categorized while the female and thus these participants was basically excluded regarding the research data.
decades = , SD = , mdn = 37, range = 18–78). We initially assessed participants‘ endorsement of traditional masculinity and then randomly assigned them to one condition in a 2 (gender norm: control vs. feminization) ? 2 (behavior type: masculine vs. feminine) experimental design. The sensitivity analysis considering a multiple linear regression model with seven predictors (3 main effects, 3 two-way interactions and 1 three-way interaction), assuming an alpha of .05 and power of .80, revealed that our final sample size was powered enough to detect an effect size of f 2 = .05 (which, by convention indicates a small effect size; see Faul et al. 2009).
Acceptance from Old-fashioned Maleness
Participants‘ approval regarding old-fashioned maleness norms is analyzed through the 26-items Men Character Norms Level (MRNS; Thompson and you can Pleck 1987). Sample items are: “I would personally notice it sometime silly or shameful in the event the a beneficial men pal out-of mine cried more an unfortunate love scene for the a motion picture”; “When a person is feeling a small aches he need not to give it time to inform you greatly”; and you may “One must not back down in the face of trouble.” Effect bills varied from just one (not really) so you’re able to 7 (absolutely). We calculated an average overall get so highest results reflected deeper affirmation regarding traditional masculinity (? = .93; Yards = step 3.82, SD = step one.11). Pokračovať v čítaní „The past try contains 292 heterosexual people (Yards“